Safety

Focuses on proactive prevention and mitigation of harms, with a focus on content and conduct safety for generated and agentic outputs for “everyday” AI products and non-frontier models, as well as frontier safety concerns applicable to  API availability and the integration of frontier models into consumer-facing products. This work complements that of the security working group, which focuses on malicious attacks by bad actors and privacy concerns, and informs all AIRR work streams.

Purpose


The world is rapidly moving from AI safety frameworks and best practices, toward international standards. The AIRR safety workstream builds upon x-industry responsible AI governance strategies and trust and safety practices to complement all other AIRR working groups by focusing acutely on the new risks of AI-generated content and relevant frontier safety and emerging agentic safety concerns. These risks are distinct from – and their mitigations supplement those for – privacy harms and security (i.e., malicious user, cyber) threats. The Safety workstream focuses on evolving product policies to govern and mitigate these risks. The workstream is informed by ML Commons multiregional safety research by the Multimodal work stream. The group focuses on how to provide consistent technical benchmarking to inform and meet evolving international standards related to AI-generated and agentic content and conduct safety and policies.

Deliverables


2026 Goals for the working group include:

Achieve expert consensus on AI safety definitions and technical edits pre ISO/ IEC SC 42 Plenary in October for specific drafts, e.g., 42119 series (testing); WG3 PWI on AI Safety and Trustworthiness Fact Labels, to support AI Reliability Label as a means for ISO IEC (and other) compliance

Publish a blog post or other thought leadership for a non-technical audience (e.g., policy, business decision-maker, mainstream) explaining what AI safety benchmarks are, how they are developed, why we need more contributors, and why they are important as the world moves from safety frameworks toward benchmarks – could be World Economic Forum Agenda Blog, Tech Policy Press, or other broad audience

Offer clear utility for integration of reliability labels for multi stakeholder initiatives for AI Safety as standards develop, e.g., Appia, Partnership on AI Hub, UN Global Dialogue for AI Governance, etc.

Paper offering a baseline framework for building AI safety benchmark datasets – for submission to international conference and/or journal (e.g., FAccT)

NeurIPS 2026 workshop

    Meeting Schedule

    Wednesdays Monthly on the fourth Wednesday, 1pm – 2pm ET

    How to Join and Access Resources




    Working Group Chairs

    William Bartholomew

    William works at the intersection of responsible AI, cybersecurity, software supply chains, open source, and standards development. As a Director of Public Policy in Microsoft’s Office of Responsible AI, William helps shape policy approaches for advanced AI systems, including foundation models, copilots, and AI agents. His work focuses on making responsible AI governance technically grounded, operationally feasible, and scalable across products, organizations, and jurisdictions. William’s policy work is informed by more than a decade designing, implementing, and operating software supply chains used by tens of thousands of developers. He brings a practical, friction-reducing mindset to standards development, open source, and public- and private-sector working groups globally.

    Reena Jana

    Reena is the Head of AI Safety Ecosystem Strategy at Google. Within the Trust & Safety organization, she leads a broad, global portfolio of external engagements with trusted organizations to build a collaborative, ecosystem approach to the research and development of best practices and standards for AI safety. Reena serves as a senior expert and advisor on AI product safety and governance. Reena is also engaged with numerous cross-industry efforts on best practices and the development of shared practices, with multi-stakeholder organizations including the World Economic Forum, the Ad Council, Partnership on AI, US Telecommunications Training Institute.

    Privacy Overview

    This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.